Comment by liftbigweights | Hacker News Reader

Comment by liftbigweights | Hacker News Reader

Parent Full thread

> Can we stop using the term ‘math prodigy’ for someone who was essentially a quant monkey - that too at best a decent one?

The guy was a math prodigy though. What else would you call one of the top math students at cambridge?

> He ain’t no Ramanujan, or a Terrence Tao or any of the recent Fields’ medalists who have poured their heart and soul into their craft with no expected financial return.

You don't have to win the Fields' medal or achieve greatness to be a prodigy. There are plenty of prodigies who fail to live up to their potential or simply choose to do other things.

It's not just in academics. There are sports prodigies who, for a variety of reasons, fail to achieve greatness.

Take baseball. For every ken griffey jr, there are a bunch of brien taylors. For every lebron, you have a greg oden or kwame brown.

>> What else would you call one of the top math students at cambridge?

I would call him a good, hardworking student. (At least that's what we'd call it in Singapore ;) Coincidentally me and Xu went to high school at the same time in Singapore)

If we labelled everyone who did well in the undergraduate curriculum as prodigal - the word itself starts loses its meaning.

Let's take the top 20 universities across the world (harvards,mits, tsinghuas, iits etc.) and take the top 10 graduating students from each class (math, physics, etc.) => are we saying that the world is producing 500-1000 prodigies every year?

> I would call him a good, hardworking student. (At least that's what we'd call it in Singapore ;)

How many singaporeans are top math students at cambridge? If hard work is all that it took, we'd all be studying math at cambridge.

> Coincidentally me and Xu went to high school at the same time in Singapore)

"Coincidentally Xu and I..."

> Let's take the top 20 universities across the world (harvards,mits, tsinghuas, iits etc.) and take the top 10 graduating students from each class (math, physics, etc.) => are we saying that the world is producing 500-1000 prodigies every year?

I'd say there are far more prodigies than that being produced every year. You do realize that there are 7 billion people on earth right?

You don't have to be newton or einstein to be a prodigy. Most prodigies never live up to their expectations. Maybe you use the word differently in singapore than in the US.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com