Hacker News Reader

I believe the survey uses ES6 (which officially is named ES2015) to refer to the "current version" of ECMAScript (which I suppose is ES2017).

I don't know if the solution is to include each yearly release of ECMAScript since ES6, or to simply add an "ES.Current" option, which would just be the latest proper release.

View on HN

Next time I think we'll just drop the ES* item altogether and instead ask developers which JS language features they use directly.

Well yes, that's my point. There's a massive difference between using class and template strings with callbacks or 'then' vs actually using Direct Style with 'await'

Reply on news.ycombinator.com