On their website, they mention the following:
> Simply, your mobile device can't connect to the Internet, it can only communicate with a Tor Bridge within our closed network.
> Configure the Tor daemon on your device to use the bridge at 10.11.12.13:9000 and wait for the network to bootstrap.
This means they are hosting the Tor bridge themselves, but the device's traffic is still going through the carrier's network in plaintext (it's weakly encrypted over the radio link to the tower but unencrypted after that).
Technically the Tor daemon is still running on your device, but is forced to use their bridge with no other options. I'm not too familiar with Tor but surely this can't be good for security right? I can imagine an attacker on the other side of their bridge spinning up a fake Tor network pretending to be the real one (a "sybil attack" with tons of fake nodes).
Basically they're giving you the worst of both worlds. The inconvenience of using Tor with none of the security & anonymity benefits.
I am involved in the mobile industry and this kind of bullshit really makes me sad. They're eroding customer's trust not just in them but in the industry as a whole, making it more difficult for anyone that actually provides a good service.