And until then, all the metric fanbois will constantly tell you that metric is superior to imperial because its measurements are immutable. Until suddenly they are.
Nobody is arguing against more precise definition of standard values, which is why Imperial units these days are themselves defined in terms of SI units. So if the meter were to change, for example, so would the US foot.
Specifically the international yard equals 0.9144 meters and the international pound equals 0.45359237 kilograms
There literally isn't another definition, in the US when you say "100 yards" the only legal meaning that has is 91.44 metres, which is whatever CGPM / BIPM says it is.
1/3 m = 33.33 cm, 1/3 ft = 4 in
1/4 m = 25.00 cm, 1/4 ft = 3 in
1/6 m = 16.67 cm, 1/6 ft = 2 in
This is why imperial makes more sense to me than metric. If we had a base-12 number system, metric would be perfect, but base-10 is terrible under division. For practical divisors like these, imperial shines.
If you're doing science, metric makes more sense because units work out. But most all US science has already adopted metric.
Using the metric system you'll rarely write 1/2m, as fractions are not what a person used to metric would default to. That is why 1/6m looks so weird as no one would use it like that, but if you write it 0.5m now it's obvious we are talking about 50cm, or 500mm.
BUT,
In those examples you are not using the system, you are just using one unit. If the question were, for example, what is the mass of the water contained in a 1m x 1m x 1m box, then the answer is obvious which system is by far the most sane one.
You're not disagreeing, the GP said
> If you're doing science, metric makes more sense because units work out. But most all US science has already adopted metric.
Your question asks for mass of a cubic meter of water, presupposing a typically scientific quantity (mass, instead of weight) and presupposing that a cubic meter (why not a cubic foot?) of water is a useful collection of water for some purpose. Fine, use metric. But imperial units as a system are made for practical everyday utility, which your example doesn't presuppose. On the other hand if we imperial users run across a situation where metric seems more useful, fortunately we can precisely convert, so it doesn't really matter.
In other places of utility (such as engineering disciplines) adopting a unit agnostic approach is the best. Some fields don't use either imperial or metric units but their own domain specific things, and software can always present units in whatever preference someone has or whatever is the most useful for the moment.
Something is 3m x 0.3cm, what area is that?
If that's one internal face of a container what width will hold a pint/litre respectively?