This is an incredibly strong statement that virtually nobody in the field agrees with.
1. Continuous variable (in the context of quantum computing) is frequently different from "analog". See bosonic codes for instance.
2. We stopped using classical analog computers because they suffer from noise (which is a fundamental problem, not just a technical issue). Noise is even worse in the case of quantum computing (the claim you make in a sibling comment that some analog systems do not have that problem is wrong/unsupported by any evidence).
3. The main point of disconnect is that noise is a fundamental issue stemming from the laws of physics and computational complexity. There is a large body of evidence that shows that the existence of a scalable analog computer (classical or quantum) will break many structures in computational complexity. A hunch is not enough of an argument to counter those. Presenting a hunch like that is extremely misleading to the people who are trying to get into the field.
4. A hunch is certainly a good thing to research, but do not present it as something of equivalent value to established facts or empirically supported conjectures.