Some of the same conflicts of interest exist in both modern cases, notwithstanding, both have opposite contribution histories.
Am I missing something?
IBM is a consulting company and their model is really different than RedHat.
Competing with AWS and Microsoft is pretty crazy and does not make sense to me. RedHat’s value is in its software, not its cloud delivery.
And, frankly, I depend a little more on centos/fedora than I do Github.
If you want enterpricey Kubernetes, scratching those auditing and authorization itches it carries, Openshift is probably on your short list.
> IBM is a consulting company and their model is really different than RedHat.
Maybe the complementariness of this could be good?
(Yes, Microsoft is a software company, but they produce a particular type of software which is why many people weren't thrilled about their acquisition of Github.)