Did you read the whole thing? This is exactly the point the author is trying to make. Look, you both arrive at the same conclusion even:

> Or you change the game and just use PureScript. Or ReasonML, or Elm, or even ClojureScript.

> If you want to see actual dynamic typing and how it can shine, use ClojureScript. If you want to see actual static typing and how it can kick ass, use PureScript.