Actually, this would be an amazing news service. "Actionable news", where the high-frequency scare-stories weren't reported on.

The Economist bought hook-line-and-sinker into Brazilian partisan politics a few weeks back. They were fooled by cultural affinity: party A speaks the language of liberal centrism but is actually much more iliberal (illiberal?) than party B. What's worse -- The Economist knew this in 2010-16...

What you are getting from The Economist is their opinions on the news, together with the news.

This is what I viewed as a balanced approach. No headlines websites or whatever but I read economist weekly