Facebook User Who Uploaded Pirated ‘Deadpool’ Copy Sentenced to 3 Weeks Prison | Hacker News Reader

Facebook User Who Uploaded Pirated ‘Deadpool’ Copy Sentenced to 3 Weeks Prison

torrentfreak.com

29 pointsneverminder15 comments

This is quite astonishing. He wasn't the guy who ripped the movie. He just shared it on fb. It was likely shared everywhere else to begin with, but he was the only one they could get because he put his real name on fb. So what's the lesson here ? Don't put your name on shit. It may seem obvious, but it is not so difficult to fall into this.

I agree, he doesn't have to be jailed or something, it might have an effect on him and even to his life. He'll be consider convicted/felon rather than a violator. Fine would be enough but having him locked up even 3 weeks in prison will have an impact on his life. Much has been said, we don't even know if that man is aware of such crime just like that, maybe he just want to share it to others that haven't seen it with a good intention.

For the law as written, sounds like a very fair sentence for the guilty.

Yeah... I don't agree that prison time is appropriate but, I do suppose the sentence was not too excessive. I suppose for most people a couple weeks in the clink is better than the 1,000,000+ fines we were seeing for copyright infringement in the 90's. Although since this is criminal I guess he could still have civil liability.

Spend a day in jail and then think about 3 weeks and whether it’s “fair”.

It's not that bad. 3 weeks means you're going to county jail (in California). 3 weeks in county is great. They feed you a bunch (5 times a day), you aren't there long enough that you are compelled to get a jail-time-job, and the weather is fair. There's a TV, books, paper, pens, cards, etc.

Jail: where you'll loose your current job and be destined for minimum wage for the rest of your life!

I know someone who served 15 years for murder and he makes $40k a year in one job, and is an investor in a sports bar.

The plural of anecdote isn't data.

Indeed. Of course, neither was the comment I was replying to.

This does bring to the light potential issues, like whether a person has any or many coping mechanisms that are part of their routine - such as perhaps certain types of entertainment, certain routine of walking places, certain comfort from their regular environment(s) or physical/material goods. For someone in a severe state and need of coping mechanisms/strategies (whether they realize it or not, whether they have any support or people helping them), it could be extremely harsh for them — so therefore, it’s relative to everyone as to what impact, or how easy it would be. For myself, if I had enough food that didn’t hurt or bother me to eat, clean water, pen and paper, place to sleep properly, then 3 weeks would be good time for deep reflection and meditation. For someone else it could be torment. And it’s not hard to assume that someone who blatantly uploads a copyright video publicly to Facebook may not have the best critical thinking skills, and therefore not the best self-care or self-awareness, awareness overall.

Using prison for non-violent offenses is ridiculous, in my opinion. For anyone who thinks “better that than a huge fine” - explain to me the difference between that and debtors prison.

To begin, I'm not arguing nor have I come to any conclusion related to whether a fine or prison time is appropriate, however a fine/financial cost is very relative to a person's financial situation, and it is also more subtle, and perhaps also in some areas someone could simply declare bankruptcy or a fine will have no impact if their life is already "in the shitter." Prison on the other hand is a concrete/tangible separation from a person's regular life/routine, and so it's guaranteed to not be subtle - however as I replied elsewhere in this thread - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=18150041 - how prison affects someone can vary greatly and be much more detrimental than what a financial cost could potentially have, and I think it would be immoral to not properly account for this - if prison time is going to be allocated; another variable to account for is around the world "prison time" has great variability as to the conditions someone is put into, likewise with the social/safety constructs of taking care of people, or not.

is the amount of effort and money spent on the case worth the 3 week punishment he received? my point is they could have better avoided the whole trial and given him a deal to do community work etc instead of sending him to prison for 3 weeks for something which even though "a crime" is not exactly rape..

Your opinion of this would change if it was a case against someone who broke into your home and stole all your laptop/phone/tv etc. "Not exactly rape" either, and really not that much total damage but still the reason they procedure the case instead of just letting the criminals off easy is that it sets an example for the general public to avoid that sort of criminal behavior.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com