According to my customers and users yes? Granted, we do a lot more than just that though.
Dl4j itself has a decent sized user base. Ranging likely from your phone maker to your bank and retail store.
We have our own software distro too which is why I'm commenting on this. We don't try
to boil the ocean with a bunch of tech though.
There's a whole new crop of companies focusing on solving bits of the ML problem well rather
than trying to do storage and god knows what else.
My point here about you guys is you're trying to compete in what is largely a commodity market.
People don't need all this stuff.
Simplicity won here. It's not about better tech.
You guys have the same pitch MapR does and largely the same problem: Better tech is only part of the problem with adoption. You need customers,
users, and a clear business
model when going to market.
Cloudera and Horton ran one playbook that at least somewhat worked (it got them public)
and now they can focus on competing with the cloud vendors,
which made the right decision and just made commonly used software easy to use.