> I wouldn't be surprised if most of the people who object to this are sexists.
What? You point out the problems with how dumb this law is and then turn around and accuse anyone of objecting to it being a sexist?
What? You point out the problems with how dumb this law is and then turn around and accuse anyone of objecting to it being a sexist?
Logically speaking it's the other way around. People who are for this law are sexists (they want discrimination on the basis of sex) and the people against it are the non-sexists (appoint purely on merit). Obviously it will be inverted in many discussions: Orwell didn't invent the term doublespeak for no reason.