Hacker News Reader

Comment by biztos | Hacker News Reader

This may be true, but it's definitely not unique to Google. I know some well-meaning leftists who work for the leading Social Network and don't see any contradiction in that.

I could imagine a high-flying company having entitled employees, I just don't see the qualitative difference between this or that company. Please enlighten me if I'm missing the point.

And lest I sound arrogant myself: I once worked in Pharma and made my peace with the price vs R&D logic.

View on HN

Well, every day there is more and more evidence ahoyt how R&D excuses in relation to the price later are that, excuses to win more money and they do not share the real investments numbers

https://www.theguardian.com/science/2018/apr/12/non-profits-...

"It is difficult to get a man to understand something, when his salary depends upon his not understanding it!" --- Upton Sinclair

Ummm, leftism has a long history of invasive mass surveillance and questionable social engineering practices, so I don’t really see the contradiction here...

Well, most of the fighting against "invasive mass surveillance and questionable social engineering practices" has also been done by leftists, so there's that...

Centrist average Joes usually don't care about such things, and right wingers applaud them to help the police and such.

As for libertarians they are against them when it's by the government, but fine with them when a private company (even one the size of a small nation) does it as part of a "voluntary" employment contract.

True. There’s the hippie leftist archetype, and the commissar leftist archetype. It’s a spectrum, so they say!

To me spectrum implies a single dimension, i.e. the spectrum of light is just based on wavelength. But this metaphor doesn't really fit with politics, which at best can be reduced to two dimensions (in my opinion), and realistically is a lot more.

Realistically the left/right spectrum is orthogonal to the authoritarian/libertarian spectrum. Classic liberalism is, I think, more aligned with the right but also profoundly anti-authoritarian. Similarly, the left has a proud tradition of supporting individual liberty but also a strong tradition of suppressing it in favour of collective power.

Corporations of all stripes tend towards authoritarianism though, in my view. It is a natural structure when you have agents using someone else's capital.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Horseshoe_theory

No. The claim is that all corporations tend toward authoritarianism. Left and middle and right. Not at all horseshoe theory.

You are conflating leftism with authorarisam

Reply on news.ycombinator.com