my god how low Scientific American has fallen
my god how low Scientific American has fallen
> Nonlinear dynamical systems, describing changes in variables over time, may appear chaotic, unpredictable, or counterintuitive, contrasting with much simpler linear systems.
Scientific American's typical reader surely understands a) the concept of a function b) the concept of proportionality.
It's fine to say that nonlinear systems are difficult to analyze, or have a reputation for being difficult to analyze. But it's bad practice for a science communicator even to run the risk of giving people the impression that the difficulty is part of the meaning (definition) of the word.
EDIT: The definition depends on the area of math you are working in. The definition of a nonlinear system of differential equations is different than the definition of a nonlinear system of polynomial equations in commutative algebra. As far as the article in question it's an accurate description of the problem and why it's a big deal.