Is there a list of well-known studies that have been overturned because they haven't been reproducible? I'm wondering how much "common knowledge" that has come from those studies is actually true or not.
I don't mean details like where/when the study was performed, because obviously the original authors thought it would generalize beyond their exact sample. I mean they will change the methods to ask different questions on a survey, etc.
Also, they use statistical significance vs not to determine if the same result was observed (rather than having quantitatively similar results)... The entire situation is ridiculous.
You can start here though: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Reproducibility_Project
https://www.nature.com/news/1-500-scientists-lift-the-lid-on...