> the proper recourse is never actively sabotaging the president of the United States
Why not?
> however, we still have a functional supreme court
We don't. Mitch McConnell saw to that 2 years ago.
Why not?
> however, we still have a functional supreme court
We don't. Mitch McConnell saw to that 2 years ago.
Because that's undermining the will of the people. Like it or not, per today, Trump was legitimately and fairly elected. This very well might change in the future, but as of now, we have to assume his presidency is legitimate, no matter how vile or incompetent he is.
I think the author is cowardly, disingenuous, and dangerous.