A friend of mine's company has a tough time keeping up with 500,000 page views a month using more equipment. They're using PHP and MySQL.
A friend of mine's company has a tough time keeping up with 500,000 page views a month using more equipment. They're using PHP and MySQL.
- What do the sites do?
- How optimised are they?
- How much static/cachable content is there?
Really there is too little data for this comparison.
Both are equally unoptimized outside of the database queries which I believe are fairly well optimized.
No real cacheble content on either outside of the usual suspects (JS, CSS, some images)
Requests/Pages per server is a bad metric to determine efficiency when every persons problems are so different.
If your utilization is so low why do you have the additional servers?
Apples and orangoutangs.
Free coffee would be enough to get me to say something nice about Microsoft products?
I work at Microsoft?