A solution?
A solution?
Switching from email to Slack is basically a test of whether or not an organization actually has some task tracking in place. If not, then Slack's claimed 41% reduction in email volume becomes a 41% reduction in customer volume. "Less work for me!"
I never understood that. It's not like email. It's corporate IRC.
So why use it at all? That's rapidly becoming my thought on this Slack mess.
If it's important they'll call me or send an email. Just like in 2015.
> just say you missed it
Technology is supposed to make data manageable. If it doesn't then it's a failure.
I've deleted the Slack app from my phone. It has progressed through the stages of Usenet in a few years. Now the signal is unrecoverable in the noise. It has failed.
For instance, your company might have a hundred slack channels and private conversations. You could be interested in five (channels specific to projects you're on, things you're interested in, or non-critical alerts), not interested in ninety (other projects, functional groups you don't care about, other groups' lunch plans), and actively disinterested in another five (#random, #politics-that-make-me-angry, #synergy, #build-system-spam).
For sure, but the UX around unread messages triggers my OCD.
Just an FYI that everybody needs to know or needs an answer regardless of when you can answer: use email
Information that is valid until a major change (or forever if that exists): document in your wiki or whatever documentation system you use.
When I'm back from time off, I mark all slack channels as read.
Disclaimer: I am a full time contributor at Zulip.