True. But his assertions are mostly fact based and support his thesis.
Who really thinks Magic Leap holds up to the hype and is really a good use of its investment capital?
Who really thinks Magic Leap holds up to the hype and is really a good use of its investment capital?
I also wouldn't trust Palmer Lucky to have anything like an objective opinion about it.
True.
> and they finally have a development kit that speaks to the path they plan to follow in the future.
...which is following the same path everyone else is, except further behind, because all those new technologies failed to work out?