Hacker News Reader

Comment by byproxy | Hacker News Reader

I wonder if this correlates with flood myths: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flood_myth

Flood myths are different than Tsunami-related myths. Flood myths talk of long-term inundation, of Noah on his ark for weeks. or of land permanently becoming sea. A tsunami-related myth is something more violent and shorter in duration. Some Thunderbird stories from the pacific-northwest, of a great bird under or associated with water, are no doubt are descriptions of tsunamis.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thunderbird_(mythology)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thunderbird_and_Whale

"A struggle ensued; the ocean receded and rose again. Many canoes were flung into trees and many people were killed."

Across the pacific, the Japanese have a similar story about a giant catfish causing earthquakes.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Namazu_(Japanese_mythology)

It's not related to tsunamis, but you might be interested in the Black Sea deluge hypothesis[1].

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Sea_deluge_hypothesis

There is a broader theory that the Earth has a lot of water in it, and is in fact a big sponge which sometimes squeezes itself, and sometimes these massive forms of water convert and to the surface in quantities which overwhelm us, the land and all, until some process unknown, "pulls it back into the core", sponge-like.

Its a crackpot theory, but I do wonder where things are going with all these scientists having interests in flood events and other crazy weather conditions.

Is there any evidence these myths are related in historicity?

Reply on news.ycombinator.com