Correction, foreign born.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sundar_Pichai
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Satya_Nadella
>Blatant factual inaccuracies
You're assuming bad faith.
>Please respond to the strongest plausible interpretation of what someone says, not a weaker one that's easier to criticize. Assume good faith.
> You're assuming bad faith.
On the contrary, I misinterpreted your meaning precisely because I was being charitable.
Your original post could've been interpreted in two ways:
1. Charitably: you simply didn't know that these people were citizens of the USA, and are reasonably suspicious of someone who built their career and fortune here but who doesn't want to obtain citizenship.
2. Uncharitably: you distrust people because of where they were born.
I chose the charitable interpretation.
I would not work on autonomous weapons or mass surveillance technology, and if I were the CEO of a company, I would abstain from deploying that company's resources in this fashion.
In your mind, does this statement provide sufficient evidence to prove that I obviously intend to work in the interests of whichever country my ancestors immigrated from?
"...and if I were the CEO of a company, I would abstain from deploying that company's resources in this fashion."
Including Google. If I were the CEO of Googe, I would do this.
Don't avoid the question. In your mind, does this statement provide sufficient evidence to prove that I obviously intend to work in the interests of whichever country my ancestors immigrated from?