Or, you know, nat-gas is cheaper, pollutes far less, is cheap, and provides much better operational capabilities for mass transit than electric, etc etc.
Or you can hand wave that all away and shout conspiracy theories.
Or you can hand wave that all away and shout conspiracy theories.
And it is cheaper, but there are also significant questions about what will happen to that cost if consumption significantly increases via mass transit.
I'm all for lower emissions, but let's not pretend there isn't a vested interest behind it.
Especially when there are also other options that don't get nearly the attention.
https://www.computerworld.com/article/3147405/sustainable-it...