I won't repeat what others have already said (Towle_, jcnnghm) but I had a long discussion about an article that made a similar argument over at Daily Beast this morning. http://www.thedailybeast.com/blogs-and-stories/2010-10-03/th...

What I found most interesting about both of these critical pieces is how they are so divorced from any sort of appropriate context (see below for more on that). For the last couple of months there has been an interesting, important debate about women in tech/Silicon Valley, in particular at TC, and other spots. I don't see how you can come out with a piece like this one or the Beast one w/o talking about that...especially when you are bringing up COO Sheryl Sandberg's role in FB's current success (which is irrelevant to the movie).

Perhaps this is the only context that matters to them - the writer at Jezebel and the writer at Daily Beast both were students at Harvard in 2003.