Why does the author of D want to "fix" C by changing it into D? Concentrate on that D language.
So we would like to improve our foundations, to move UNIX derived OSes to some kind of safer C, instead of having it be the backdoor of the whole security infrastructure.
What's the downside?
> by changing it into D?
That comment is tendentious, hyperbolic, and generally credibility-damaging.
> Concentrate on that D language.
You think he doesn't?