This article seems to be mostly tongue-in-cheek, written to advertise her coaching services (for men). I found it annoying until the section at the end titled "So What Could We Do Instead?" Point #3 is valid, [edit: I disagree that #5 -- sex robots -- would be of any help whatsoever.]

> 3. Redistributing actual money income and wealth in a way that prioritizes human well-being. A Universal Basic Income could go a long way toward ending the domestic abuse of women and girls, and would help people to approach each other more as equals in the sexual field. This would open up more sexual opportunities to everyone.

I think this is an important point that made the article worth reading. Some young women are taken advantage of by men who've learned how to push their buttons. I have a friend who was traumatized when she let herself be intimate with males who weren't actually that interested in her...

Sometimes I find myself offering relationship advice to women. Last week I met a lady who had a neat story about how she met her husband. Her sister had dragged her to a wedding, future-husband stood up across the room, and she was 'instantly' intrigued. (This woman thought she wasn't very "intuitive", which is why I asked if she was in a relationship. She'd tried to protest that she didn't want to go to that wedding, but eventually "JUST GO!" won out.)

I gave her a rendition of "the difference between boys and girls" [0], which she found to be quite amusing. For the most part, for women finding a relationship is a matter of screening out the men they aren't interested in. Men are biologically programmed to be interested in having "marital relations" with any number of women who don't reciprocate, and it's mostly a numbers game of expressing interest until you find someone who is interested.

[0] https://www.taxiwars.org/2016/02/the-difference-between-boys...

Relationship coaching for men is mostly about teaching them how to be less obnoxious.