I can only find a re-hash/copy-pasta of the story on google and the slides are nowhere to be seen.
Isn't it reasonable to expect from journalists to try and get the pertinent thing of this story rather than repeating a "they said/ he said" story ?
Either the guy is a creep or they massively overreacted , or somewhere in the middle, but how are we to make an informed opinion of we can't see the actual thing ?