I'm using your evidence to prove my point as that is a source you seem to believe.
What do you get from laughing at other people?
EDIT: Your reply has been flagged which is not something I wanted. I do have evidence, yours.
What do you get from laughing at other people?
EDIT: Your reply has been flagged which is not something I wanted. I do have evidence, yours.
10% is a huge sample size for any survey. Look at how it's calculated - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sample_size_determination
or just plug in your numbers here - https://www.checkmarket.com/sample-size-calculator/
EDIT: Someone is also flagging or downvoting your comments. Not me.
Where is your evidence for anything that you’ve said? Where is your evidence that it's polluted?
People who are fine with their apps don't write reviews.
Ten percent of the user base (at most) write reviews.
This includes the people who want to complain more than the people who don't.
In this ten percent a fraction of reviews are negative.
A fraction of ten percent of the total users feel negatively about the app.
This is a rare occurrence.
If you feel I've misquoted any part then I apologize.
This is obviously incorrect since you can see positive reviews, many of them in fact, on many apps. I myself have posted positive reviews... not sure when you thought I agreed to this.
That alone pretty much kills your whole theory. Sorry but I still don’t agree with you and I think you’re really reaching here. Most importantly though, you have presented zero evidence in favor of your claims.
People like sharing their experiences with others. They’ve been doing it for thousands of years. Go figure.
Care to try again?
"I've seen 3 star reviews so it must be true, because I've seen 3 star reviews, personally"
Was there a salient point that you were trying to make or are you just going to continue to misrepresent definitions of words that you can easily look up for yourself?
Empiricism is a view of epistemology, that cannot be reduced to a definition in the Oxford dictionary.
If you look at the link below, you'll see just how murky the field of empiricism is.
https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/logical-empiricism/#EmpVe...
I'm sorry for assuming you were speaking with any depth when talking about empiricism. If your base entire arguments on dictionary definitions then it's no surprise this conversation is going in circles.
I’d love to hear you make an argument that will shed light on things from your knowledge of the “murky the field of empiricism” though. Let’s hear it!
So far all of you’ve done is point out what it is. I don’t think you really explained how it helps your case at all. How does it invalidate the easily observable fact that you can see plenty of people leaving reviews for apps that they are just fine with?
You said people don’t leave those types of reviews but there they are. So what are you going to say that makes them somehow disappear? Really, I’d like to understand. Do we really need Plato though to explore this? I think if you really understand something you should be able to explain in pretty simple terms.