The security questions could be answered by then more easily instead of having to dig - I get that. But that’s not enough imho.
You have the right to express your opinion, for sure. But when you make a blanket judgement with little you’re going against HN guidelines:
> Be civil. Don't say things you wouldn't say face-to-face. Don't be snarky. Comments should get more civil and substantive, not less, as a topic gets more divisive.
> Please don't post shallow dismissals, especially of other people's work. A good critical comment teaches us something.
The HN guidelines do not expect everyone to be positive. Negative feedback that's justified is important in any community.
This wasn't a blanket judgement without input. This was a judgement based on the available evidence, and particularly pointing at holes where one would expect a white hat to have solid documents.
I wonder if this is one of those startups where YC said "this team is solid, they'll likely pivot into something worthwhile".