I would imagine there is a pretty strong first amendment case against such laws in the United States. Mask laws have been successfully challenged on those grounds (though sometimes the challenges have been unsuccessful).
"No shoes, no shirt, no service" has also been a thing for as long as convenience stores have been around.
Not that far of a stretch to think this will ultimately extend to face paint.
If you want true anonymity, just wear a motorcyle helmet everywhere. We still don't know who The Stig is.
We don't know who the current Stig is and it's entirely possible in my opinion that there have been "stand in Stigs" as well. Obscuring the face with a tinted-shield racing helmet eliminates a big method people tell others apart. You'd have to rely on clues like height / build instead. Makes it easier to swap out drivers for that character.
This is not true in the US. Banks certainly have a right to give any information you've given them to the government though.
I've never heard of this.
> "No shoes, no shirt"
That's health code, not appearance.
There's a rap record label in the UK called "No Hats No Hoods", because of the ubiquity of that sign in certain parts of London.
But here's the thing: Nobody except my ISP even knows that I use a VPN. Nobody knows that I'm interested in online privacy and security issues. Because I only get into that online, using VPNs and Tor.
>That's health code, not appearance.
There's no such health code. At least the "shoes" part has been thoroughly researched: