Hacker News Reader

Getting a nice check while doing nothing actually productive is soul crushing. Good for the short term but it's a Chinese water torture in the long run.

Two years ago at their vegas conference they had a coffee shop that used AI to recommend coffee types. I thought "boy, they don't understand this technology".

Many years ago, when AI was expert systems and "neural networks" were fringe, the main demo for one of the public expert system leaders was the Wine Advisor. You'd tell it what you were going to eat and it would recommend a wine.

And behind the scenes it was probably the equivalent of flipping a coin between red and white.

It was totally rule-based. More complex systems had a little more probabilistic stuff via Bayes and "certainty factors", but not this one.

I worked on another one for this company called Vibration Advisor which diagnosed odd noises in GM cars.

Being rules based isn't necessarily a bad thing or disingenuous. I develop healthcare AI products (ML/DL researcher) and we actually aim to be able to translate our models into a rules based engine (find a strong signal, interpret/understand model well enough to translate/embed into a rules engine, look for a new signal in our models, rinse + repeat). We end up deploying a mix of rules based and true ML based models into production but it may not be immediately obvious to the end user which type of model they are using.

I didn't mean it as being disingenuous - that's precisely the value that was sold and if you could do the proper "knowledge engineering", it worked well. It's just interesting to me having seen the previous turn of the AI hype wheel, how much is being repeated.

Another interesting thing was the transition from special purpose hardware - Lisp machines - to C code on commodity platforms. A contrast from today's ML moving in the other direction.

That's fair. Google's recent paper on predicting patient deaths is another good example of this (logistic regression + good feature engineering performed just as well as their deep learning models, and the logistic regression has the added benefit of being significantly more interpretable and as a result, actionable).

It'll be interesting to see when specialized ML focused silicon will become readily available. Right now I find ML libraries that are able to run on blended architectures (any combination of CPU and GPU's) much more exciting/impactful than TPU's. The ability to deploy on just about any cluster a customer may have available is huge.

In the near future customers don't have clusters, cloud providers offer elastic adaptive compute sharing.

From my experiences (currently work with several Fortune 100 health insurers/benefits managers, and have previously worked for another large insurer, a major academic medical center, and a large pharma company), healthcare organizations tend to be rather cloud adverse (most of our contracts very explicitly forbid us from using any form of 3rd party cloud computing). So while I agree that much of the heavy lifting will shift to the cloud (or already has), I expect health analytics will continue to favor on-premises solutions (GPU’s still tend to be pretty rare compared to CPU based clusters but are slowly becoming more common).

As someone in the field, what do you think about the idea of a fully automated "doctor"?

Are we close to it being technically feasible , leaving aside regulation and interpersonal qualities doctors bring to the table ?

Depends on the definition of "doctor".

The likes of INTERNIST, CADUCEUS, and MYCIN have been around and provably accurate starting in the late 70s through the mid-80s. MYCIN even arguably sparked the 1st AI boom. But there were ethical issues with computer-aided diagnosis that I'm not sure have been solved/overcome.

Perhaps the current startup generation can get past them with Zuckerberg, Kalanick and Holmes as role models. :)

It's funny how much complex "AI" really comes down to If and Switch statements. "Utility AI" is popular for videogame AI right now - it's weighted switches.

Diagnosing vibrations is all the rage right now, it's just rebranded under "predictive maintenance". The Industrial Internet of Things crowd is all hyped up about it.

This is the same thing done by a startup that is current spamming Reddit with ads.

What about getting a nice check while thinking you're doing something actually productive which ends up, in the final analysis, being meaningless? Alternatively, what about doing something that seems soul crushing and pointless but is actually productive?

I'm living this right now and I hate it so, so much.

Nearly everything about working in modern corporations is terrible, so a good paycheck and not-too-stressful working conditions are close to the best that most of us can hope for.

Of course, there are those who make their way into the small clique of people at any tech company that get to do impactful, fulfilling work. But any given person is unlikely to be one of them, and if you want to be one of them you usually have to kill yourself working crazy hours first. (And probably afterwards too.)

I heard this joke years before working at Kaleida Labs (a joint venture of Apple and IBM), but it rang true while I was living the joke:

Q: What do you get when you cross Apple and IBM?

A: IBM.

While I was working at Kaleida, I gave a wild ScriptX demo to Lou Gerstner using a bouncing eyeball to navigate a map of interactive rooms. After the demo, he complained that "The eyeball was a little too right-brained for me." I was all "Dag nab it, I should have used the other eyeball!!!"

https://medium.com/@donhopkins/1995-apple-world-wide-develop...

"The last thing IBM needs right now is a vision." -Lou Gerstner

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Louis_V._Gerstner_Jr.

> IBM is just too big to get out of its own way

Brilliantly put

Funny thing is, when it did get out of its own way, what did we get? The IBM PC

...A very successful platform. Just not for IBM.

"Well, everybody knows the important part is the hardware. There's a Mr Gates from a company called Microsoft that can sell us the software"

Well yes, that's because they immediately tried to differentiate themselves with fun stuff like Microchannel Architecture to try and make their machines proprietary again.

I stayed for a few simple reasons...the fat consultant check I cashed every Friday. Exposure to some outstanding engineers and coders where I got to learn from true talent. The great strip club on A1A next to my rental in Lauderdale-by-the-Sea.

Heh... I did some work for IBM at the office of Cypress Creek Road back in that same time range. My fondest memory of the entire experience is eating at the Calypso Restaurant[1], a great Jamaican / Caribbean Islands place nearby.

I'd almost go back to Fort Lauderdale and work for IBM again (if they even still have a presence there) just for the Jamaican Jerk chicken from Calypso.

[1]: http://www.calypsorestaurant.com/

I always thought Watson Health would be like a smaller spin-off product that wasn't influenced too much by IBM. T

Given all the expectation of its product and the importance of ML/AI, it makes sense this was impossible.