Or search with the title, the author republishes his articles later.
Because Forbes actually has quality in depth reporting on a variety of topics.
Because it just so happens that Forbes has an article about astronomy.
Yes, but it's probably rubbish clickbait. They locked me out of the site when I opted out of tracking. Good riddance and I look forward to their receiving a hefty fine from the EU for GDPR non-compliance.
Yes, I had the same issue. Selected just the minimal cookies they said they needed to run the site. Site makes you way several minutes while the "process your request". Then got locked out. Oh well, another site I can live without, but I too look forward to them getting a fine from the EU.
Yup just ridiculous. Opting out of targeted advertising doesn't mean you can't show ads. Dumbest thing really, how much more money they were going to make if I consented to ad tracking? A percent of a cent?
The title doesn't seem to embellish the article, and others are noting that the author is credible. Sorry to hear that you were blocked from being able to read it.
The author is not credible - he posts almost every day and he doesn't understand half of it. It's just fluff.
Ethan Siegel is trained as a theoretical astrophysicist.
And unable to make it as a scientist, he turns to journalism, where he can spout any bullshit without having to back it up with facts.
¯\_(ツ)_/¯ I'm just going off what others with a deeper understanding of theoretical astrophysics than me are saying.
Is there a specific reason we shouldn't, do you think?