The selective quoting of JzG's arbcom election page from 12 years ago is basically doing exactly what Philip Cross is being accused of.
Is this how fivefilters normally conduct themselves?
Is this how fivefilters normally conduct themselves?
JzG initially tried to shut down discussion of this issue when it was brought to his attention (he decided there was "Zero evidence of COI [conflict of interest]" within 2 minutes - other Wikipedia admins clearly now disagree and have implemented a topic ban).
He then went on to frame the whole debate around a dispute between two individuals, when in fact it's much more than that, as has been clear from the beginning.
When that didn't work, he went after the Wikipedia editor who had brought this whole thing to their attention.
You don't find his conduct abnormal?
You might be interested in this statement from another Wikipedia editor, made today, about JzG's conduct: https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Adminis...