There is more than a hint of antisemitism to the blood thirst directed at him and to this repeating ritual.
There is more than a hint of antisemitism to the blood thirst directed at him and to this repeating ritual.
Blatant political corruption
Selling/distributing of user data to shady third parties
Poor protection of user data
Privacy invasion beyond what's reasonable to sell people adds
Tracking of individuals who do not have accounts
...
Do I have that right? If so I find it hard to agree with your conclusion.
Edit: OP edited the anti-semitism bit out of their comment.
Of course they do, and they have for a while now. It's how they make money. In fact, they not only sell data they collect on your use of their service, they sell data based on information scraped by their persistent cookies as you browse other sites:
https://consumerist.com/2014/06/12/facebook-is-now-selling-y...
The rest (your distortions aside) was already addressed by him and the company on many occasions still the animus directed at him is extraordinary.
'Damian Collins, the chair of the DCMS committee, said: “We asked them to look for evidence of Russian influence and they came back and told us something we now know appears misleading. And we’re still waiting for answers to 40 questions that Mike Schroepfer was unable to answer, including if they have any record of any dark ads.
“It could be that these adverts are just the tip of the iceberg. It’s just so hard getting any sort of information out of them, and then not knowing if that information is complete.” ' from https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2018/may/12/facebook-...
Or do they not fit your narrative?