If you can't put up the whole amount, you can pay a bail bondsman a fee and you become his problem.
Both these concepts are good things for the accused. What is your alternative? Fill up the jails? Just use the honor system?
If you can't put up the whole amount, you can pay a bail bondsman a fee and you become his problem.
Both these concepts are good things for the accused. What is your alternative? Fill up the jails? Just use the honor system?
Lots more here:
Bail, no, but money bail, yes; there is an active movement, at the federal level and within several states, to move away from, and ultimately eliminate, the system of money bail. Kamala Harris (D-CA) and Rand Paul (R-KY) introduced a bill last year with that aim; in California, SB 10 passed the Senate last year and is now in the Assembly.
For someone who is already comparatively poor (ie. no savings), why is "being a fugitive who also owes someone money" worse than "being a fugitive"?