Regular, non-EV code-signing certs, aren't as useful as they were when Vista / Windows 7 were the main Windows OSes.
Here's an excerpt from MSDN:
> Detractors may claim that SmartScreen is “forcing” developers to spend money on certificates. It should be stressed that EV code signing certificates are not required to build or maintain reputation with SmartScreen. Files signed with standard code signing certificates and even unsigned files continue to build reputation as they have since Application Reputation was introduced in IE9 last year. However, the presence of an EV code signing certificate is a strong indicator that the file was signed by an entity that has passed a rigorous validation process and was signed with hardware which allows our systems to establish reputation for that entity more quickly than unsigned or non-EV code signed programs.
Source: https://blogs.msdn.microsoft.com/ie/2012/08/14/microsoft-sma...
I already read that blog post. I’m person that linked to it in the forum post.
However, isn’t getting an EV certificate impossible for a natural person? You’d have to be some sort of legally recognized organization. Not exactly suitable for small-scale Open Source development.
no? random example:
https://sourceforge.net/projects/keepass/files/KeePass%202.x...
signer is: "Open Source Developer, Dominik Reichl"
edit: another example
https://yarnpkg.com/latest.msi
signer is: "Daniel Lo Nigro"
> We do not issue EV Code Signing certificates to natural persons!
Yarn: Not an EV certificate either: "Organizationally validated certificates used to sign standard objects." (2.16.840.1.114412.3.1 in addition to 2.23.140.1.4.1).