Hacker News Reader

You should consider refuting his argument instead of countering with a rant.

>Many more people in the US would have access to health care, including insurance for catastrophic events, if the state and federal governments stopped interfering in the supply side.

View on HN

I really don’t care about how to slightly tweak our current unjust system to make it slightly less bad. The fact that it’s unjust (hence why I’m calling out his moral arguments) makes any details a irrelevant. Like asking “How could the trains to Auschwitz have been more efficient - why won’t you debate me on this?” (Sorry for Godwin’s law-ing)

There are alternatives that are picking up support, like Medicare for all, that are worth more time and energy discussing.

Reply on news.ycombinator.com