They did not disclose their connection to LendEDU and if LendEDU profited from their fraudulent pretenses or representations then there you have it.
They did not disclose their connection to LendEDU and if LendEDU profited from their fraudulent pretenses or representations then there you have it.
I'm no lawyer, but making a fraudulent identity for the sake of controlling student lending seems on its face very wrong.
With Drew Cloud and The Student Loan Report, they pretended to be a single person who has personal experience with whatever, but definitely no affiliation with LendEDU. So if LendEDU paid them (or gave them any other benefits) to talk positively about them and steer business towards them, it is fraudulent.
Are tech entrepreneurs viewed as inept at communication and thus need a proxy to speak publicly?
Why not make such statements through a spokesperson or the CEO?