Hacker News Reader

Risk assessment is often a politically heavy org that sometimes writes the report before assessing.

In some organizations they quack like auditors, but aren’t really auditors. Usually if they are involved, a big shot doesn’t want to do something.

In terms of legitimate reasons, there may be discretionary expenses relating to insurance that can be cut for clubs, but not for sports.

Using risk assessment as a political smokescreen is illegitimate from my point of view.

> In terms of legitimate reasons, there may be discretionary expenses relating to insurance that can be cut for clubs, but not for sports.

This could be a legitimate reason to cut a risky club while allowing a similarly risky sport; it is not a legitimate reason to hide the report.