Meanwhile Google is experimenting tirelessly with AI that ‘corrects’ my searches, pushes mentally draining and content starved hype sites to the top and redirects me to buggy AMP versions of sites that were fine previously.
Meanwhile Google is experimenting tirelessly with AI that ‘corrects’ my searches, pushes mentally draining and content starved hype sites to the top and redirects me to buggy AMP versions of sites that were fine previously.
Also I agree that Google is outsmarting itself in terms of guessing what users want. It used to be you could learn how to coax Google into giving good results, but its queries feel way less expressive these days because they're trying to be smart.
I'm better at learning the behavior of a stupid search engine than a smart search engine is at learning my behavior (for now at least).
I still use Google Scholar a lot though.
I have been back and forth between Google, DuckDuckGo and Bing for this precise reason. I don't want my search engine to outsmart me, or to think that I am interested in the most recent result instead of the most relevant, or... a bunch of other similar stuff where Google is the worst offender. Recently I have used DDG more because I have the feeling it just does what I tell it to do, not what it thinks I'm trying to get at.
Hopefully someone from DDG will see this because I have no clue where to send feedback.
https://support.google.com/websearch/answer/7631341?p=encryp...