This is why WordPress rolled out a built-in automatic updater.
What could go wrong.
Well, after several years not much went wrong. There was a single case where the updated broke the update process, thus forcing users to a single manual (still one-click) update. I.e. the worst that happened is that in one instance wordpress was as bad as any other major CMS by not having working automated updates.
What went right however is that probably thousands of wordpress infections have been prevented by automated updates that work 99% of the time.
Wordpress surely isn't perfect, but the fact that they have automated updates that work most of the time means they're more secure than any of their major competitors for now.
You're talking about whether something has gone wrong with the auto-update system, specifically.
However, the parent comment was referencing the risk inherent in granting a PHP application write permissions on its own files. Doing so means that almost any exploit in the application can result in persistence, because malware can be written into (hidden in) core Wordpress files. You would not necessarily know how often this happens, because it happens to individual sites.
The Wordpress community decided that the risk of not patching quickly outweighed the risk of allowing Wordpress to write its own files. I happen to agree with them; unpatched vulnerabilities are like candy for script kiddies and fall easily to automated attacks. And most people running Wordpress are not sophisticated.
That said, for teams that are on the ball about managing updates, running Wordpress with locked down filed/directory permissions is definitely more secure.
All software has bugs, the easier and quicker to fix them and roll out those fixes the better?
If your auto-update system also means a single RCE vulnerability can then embed malicious content into the program itself, that is worse than non automatic updates.
What signing keys? Wordpress's automatic updates aren't signed, so your trust is horrendously misplaced.
Someone already did the work for them to implement it[0], and rather than commit it, a Wordpress developer wrote a blogpost saying signing isn't really that important[1].
[0] https://core.trac.wordpress.org/ticket/39309
[1] https://medium.com/@photomatt/wordpress-and-update-signing-5...
Since this is done extremely rarely, that leads me to believe that its more of a cultural problem (perhaps with the WordPress team, even) than a technical one.
Spent 5 years in shared PHP web hosting, can confirm that most of the people are muddling through with the bare minimum of understanding to get WordPress going.
I've found that clicking a comment's timestamp to view a permalink to it will usually allow replying.
That is inherently not the default for wordpress, and at that point you may as well be installing via deb/rpm.
I didn’t say scheduled updated are bad I said a self writable web app is a fucking security nightmare.
If php has permission to extract an archive with new files over the current ones, it has permission to write a malicious file over a current one.
I’m not talking about a vulnerability on the wordpress central infra that delivers a malicious update via the legitimate update path.
I’m talking about a vulnerability in the millions of wordpress installs that have filesystem permissions to overwrite themselves, to facilitate “auto update”.
I don't do as much with WP these days, but have worked with it some over the years, and work with multiple folks in the geographic area who primarily do WP work (friends with folks who run WP meetings and do all-WP work, etc).
I've seen dozens of exploited systems in the last 2-3 years, and been asked to help 'clean them up'. Every single one of those was some variation on some bot exploiting some code (in core or in a plugin) that allowed for some obfuscated code to be written to a publicly accessible directory, with names like "includes.php" or "sys.php" (things like that) - common words that no one who is not a WP expert would even think to question in the first place (no one leaves BACKDOOR_EXPLOIT.php as a file name, for example).
Yes, you can install stuff like wordfence and similar tools to continually scan your disk to look for 'infections', but... why allow those to be written to the drive in the first place? I know the answer is "convenience", but it's been a huge community price to pay.
I did that more than once back in the good ol' days before the fancy schmancy automatic updates. After you do it a few times, though, you'll probably just give up and modify the file permissions so that WordPress can update itself at which point...
If the user that WordPress (or the web server stack, I suppose) is running as has write permissions on the directory where WordPress lives, it can update itself directly without having to FTP to localhost or whatever. Of course, typically we'd say it would be a bad idea for the application to be able to do that but blah blah risk assessment blah blah trade-offs blah blah ...
For a long while, this was a widely accepted/standard way of hosting multiple customers on a shared web server, using something like suexec+php-cgi or (even better, IMO) mpm-itk. Then, each customer's WordPress site would run under its own uid/gid in order to isolate them from one another. A single customer could break their own instance or allow it to get hacked over and over again, but at least it couldn't get to other users' sites. I'm not sure how the large shared web hosts are handling this nowadays or if anything has even changed.
(Edit: After reading your other comments, mgkimsal, it's obvious that you already know all of this but I'm not going to delete/edit my comment now.)
So many of the problems in WP stem from the extreme 'hackability' from the early days, and a resistance to push for more security by default (the lack of ability to even attempt to install updates via ssh is, imo, a good example).
On shared hosting I’d have thought a user-account cronjob calling the app via cli (not via curl) could do the updates - but wordpress has always veered for “offer a shit solution to everyone” over “offer a secure solution to some subset of everyone”.
my default for wp installs is to just take write permission off everything all the time, then re-enable it when I know I will be doing something needing to write (updates, etc). There are likely some actual WP users who are not technical yet actually use the system to do their own content updates, but almost everyone I know who's using wordpress is managing it on behalf of their clients, doing all the content updates for them. These people could/should probably get familiar enough with ssh and stronger security practices, but the 'one click update' for themes/plugins/core seems to give a very strong (but ...problematic) sense of security.