Here's a chance for you to make some easy money: I'l bet you any amount you care to wager that I can color any planar map you can produce an actual drawing of with four colors.
Using map opens you to claims such as that a map containing the North Sea, the kingdom of the Netherlands, the kingdom of Belgium, the French Republic and the Federal Republic of Germany can’t be four-colored because they all border each other (the kingdom of the Netherlands and the French Republic on Saint Martin in the Caribbean)
Historically, other examples likely existed, as land ownership tended to be patchy in feudal Europe, and, later, colonies added borders between various European countries.
Theories are not laws; only takes one counter-example to disprove them.
A theory is a hypothesis. It's a plausible-but-unproven guess.
A theorem is a fact which is known because it has been proven.
As you're probably aware, this confusing patchwork of similar and overlapping yet distinct meanings is ripe for abuse: it's what allows people to get away with saying things like "evolution is just a theory".
[1] Here it means "the collective body of work of some school of thought".
[2] "A widely-accepted, well-tested scientific explanation for a phenomenon".
[3] "A subfield of mathematics; the set of definitions, theorems, and techniques related to a particular type of abstract object" (in this case, groups).
I agree, apparently it only took a couple of minutes in mspaint to disprove yours :)
On a serious note, what hermitdev did we've probably all done at some point in our past, especially in our youth (disparaging long-standing theories about life, science, philosophy, etc.), no need to be mean.
Few times this leads to groundbreaking revelations that help humanity progress, but most times it leads to the embarrassing conclusion that past generations were not idiots.
He was a good guy. Took me several days to finally understand my mistake, but afterward I had a much better understanding of the problem