I exaggerate but not by much.
Don't get me wrong, not a huge fan of Oracle but am curious to know if there is an actual problem, or if this is simply a hater-ade/fanboy party with no substance.
On the other hand, without the problems, the solution engineers might not exist...
...which is, in one sentence, the reason why Oracle consultants exist.
You've never had to deal with Oracle sales or "support" staff or -- even worse -- manage or support Oracle products in production, have you? If you had, well, you would already know the answer. Oracle RDBMS might be the one exception.
(FWIW, I mean "real" Oracle products, not, say, MySQL or Oracle Linux, for example.)
Ignore the comments and just try it. Run an instance for a weekend, try to setup a site or install a DB and see how it goes. I think you'll learn very quickly why the reputation exists.
VM.Standard.1.1 and VM.Standard1.16, same cost but the latter has 16 cores instead of 1 (same CPU), 112 GB memory instead of 7.
The only thing it has in common with a proper cloud thing like AWS or GCP is the 'cloud' in the name.
The rest of their products are managed services running on this, similar to the other clouds, and they work fine for what they are. Bandwidth costs are always the limiting factor though with any cross-cloud situation and their Watson AI is useless and nowhere near what they hype.
I moved a lot of infra out of AWS and into GKE which I'm loving. Outside of GKE, which is great. GCP has a few things that I like better than AWS.
I also moved some infra into Azure, specifically into ACS, and then AKS and now ACS-engine.
It is very much not great.