1. Most web "apps" actually only work on Chrome, so there's that. So much for the open, standardized web.
2. Most web apps track the heck out of everything you do.
3. Most web apps are sluggish and use more resources than they should.
4. Most web apps are like Juicero, expensive solutions to non existent problems.
This is completely anecdotal, so I'll volunteer my own anecdote: I've used Firefox for years and basically never run into issues. Sometimes a website will say "We don't support your browser", but if you change your user agent it works fine.
> 2. Most web apps track the heck out of everything you do.
So installing a native app with even MORE access to what you do is a better solution? How about Uber tracking you after you get out of your cab? To suggest this is a "web app" problem is false.
> 4. Most web apps are like Juicero, expensive solutions to non existent problems.
Haha, you are SO RIGHT about this one! One of my smell-tests for a web-app is: "Could your website be reasonably replaced with a spreadsheet?"
It's funny because I LOVE spreadsheets, and simply using a spreadsheet is better 99% of the time.
That ain't too bad. A handful of apps like that could let a developer live reasonably comfortably.