If you've met her, you'll know she's extremely brilliant, but I don't think this situation is something that can be solved by a statement. I'm assuming a lot of actions will be taken first internally before she speaks publically.
"Mr. Stamos had been a strong advocate inside the company for investigation and disclosing Russian activity on Facebook, often to the consternation of other top executives, including Sheryl Sandberg, the social network’s chief operating officer, according to the current and former employees, who asked not to be identified discussing internal matters."
"Perlroth [NY Times reporter], however, confirmed that a change occurred after Facebook’s public relations team reached out to the New York Times with a statement some time after the story was published."
https://lawandcrime.com/exclusive/facebook-forces-nyt-to-qui...
Given that the FTC are making interested noises and the EU are very interested too, it’s just as likely she’s trying to avoid getting “her brand” too closely associated with the mess.
If I’m wrong and the problem is fixable, now is the perfect time to demonstrate extreme brilliance by fixing it.
Any examples?
Of course there's her background, but 1) that doesn't require anyone to know her and 2) it means she's successful, which may or may not mean she's brilliant.
Perhaps I'm just jaded by years in a BigCo. All a high position means to me is that they're "brilliant" at politicking and networking. (And staying silent in this case may be an example of that "brilliance").