The man just can't help himself.
The man just can't help himself.
In general I think people should just stop being triggered by Wolfram's comments.
Yes, he does go out of his way to emphasize what he feels are his personal contributions.
Yes, in some cases some of his claims do appear to be a bit exaggerated (e.g. some of his cellular automata stuff)
But at the end of the day, he is still a pretty smart guy who actually writes about math/science topics fairly well, and I think that is far more important than raging every single time he gives himself credit for something or emphasizes his own work on a topic.
Actually, I am sure he did, he's too smart to not have realized this, but I think he has one of those incredibly fragile egos where he needs to validate himself all the time to random people, even if doing has negative impacts on him.
Zuckerberg doesn't do this, Musk doesn't do, Gates doesn't do this, the Google guys do not do this. I could go on and on. So many smart successful people do not have to do this all the time, but Wolfram does. It is so self-inflicted.
That also speaks tons about people who take offence at (hate) others for giving themselves generous credit.
Maybe, but if someone was really beautiful and they had to keep pointing this out to you, would you like to hang around them? Or would you think they are vain and self-centered and basically avoid them because they fit the definition of "obnoxious."
http://www.cs.cornell.edu/courses/cs6830/2009fa/scribes/lect...
It's about 6500 words. And these are the 17 you take issue with: and I even independently came up with it when I was about 13 years old, in 1973.
I'm fairly convinced if I pay enough attention to anyone I'll find something to criticise them about, but that generally doesn't say anything about the quality or impact of their work in the world.
Do you have anything substantive to say about the article itself?