VP9 outperforms H.264 (libvpx versus x264) for Netflix's use case. Here are some articles from the Netflix TechBlog on their experiences with VP9 and their encoding approach in general:
https://medium.com/netflix-techblog/optimized-shot-based-enc...
https://medium.com/netflix-techblog/more-efficient-mobile-en...
https://medium.com/netflix-techblog/netflix-downloads-on-and...
Imagine if Netflix spends 1M on encoding, even 5x is 4M more, and the current encoder is anywhere from 250M to 2.5B more. This is not a small sum of money.
I think before they talk about speed up, they just need to iron out all the bugs and bitstream freeze before we speak.
But they can start with only the most popular videos to get the most bang per buck, they'll also likely target geographic areas with low bandwidth but decent spec desktops, which means they're getting a return on investment by increasing reach, not just saving bandwidth.
So basically, there's plenty of niches where it makes sense almost as soon as the spec is frozen and they can expand the roll out as it proves itself and speeds up.
And six months ago they had improved on that to do live streaming with 32 cores: https://bitmovin.com/constantly-evolving-video-landscape-dis...
So I'll be interested to read about any live streaming demos they do at NAB in the next couple of weeks.