Making decisions or reacting to stimuli does not necessarily require any form of intelligence. You probably meant automation instead of "AI".
Although I can see why some point out that AI is a moving target, representing only what still seems 'magical'. If you showed an ABS system to someone in the early 1900s, I truly believe they would see it as some kind of intelligence. Now that we have acclimated to the technology, we don't see it the same way.
Do you have any specific sources that define it as that?
>An ABS system would fit into this definition as it is a task that normally would require human sensing the conditions to know how to apply the breaks.
Responding to stimuli does not require any intelligence, let alone human intelligence.
Several definitions as provided by a Google Search.
> Responding to stimuli does not require any intelligence, let alone human intelligence.
Which is why we call it artificial intelligence instead of intelligence. If these systems were actually intelligent, there would be no reason to add the artificial moniker. We specifically call the types of systems artificial intelligence on recognition that it is not actually what we consider real intelligence.
I agree, there is nothing intelligent about an ABS system, and nobody is labeling it as intelligent.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Artificial_intelligence
> Artificial intelligence (AI, also machine intelligence, MI) is intelligence demonstrated by machines, in contrast to the natural intelligence (NI) displayed by humans and other animals.
Artificial intelligence is intelligence, just made artificially instead of organically. You clearly have no understanding of the term so you should probably shut up.