The risk here is that there are people fighting to get out of prison for things they're not guilty of. If you have realistic expectations that police and their representative prosecutors can and do lie, please exercise caution.
The risk here is that there are people fighting to get out of prison for things they're not guilty of. If you have realistic expectations that police and their representative prosecutors can and do lie, please exercise caution.
If you say "You shouldn't believe anything a cop testifies to" will get you booted pretty quickly.
If you say this you won't be selected. Engineers and Scientists routinely get denied because of the application of logic.
You'd be surprised. The DAs/lawyers on the other side can see right through this, and don't want it. They want someone that is more likely to show blind trust to the law side.
And guess which answer got people dismissed?
Remember the prosecution have a limited number of dismissals and statements like that are desired by the defense.
If the system considers police testimony as ground truth, why bother with judge and jury?