Hacker News Reader

Well, since you're here...

In mid-November, I bought a Christmas gift for my son (a drone) on-line through Wal-mart.

The text on the Wal-mart web-page urged me to purchase now (to guarantee on-time delivery).

The shipment of the drone was fulfilled by a 3rd party.

I got the drone in early December, wrapped it and my son opened it on Xmas day.

Drone didn't work. Out. of. the. box.

I asked for a refund, and Wal-mart customer service told me to pound sand b/c the product came from a 3rd party that had a 30-day return policy (no exceptions).

I know I'm a drop in the bucket, and I may not always be able to avoid Wal-mart, but I told them I would do my level best to shop elsewhere.

That's when you contact your bank and issue a chargeback.

I've noted that people quickly advise others to issue a chargeback as a resort to "win" against a company that has supposedly "wronged" them, even in cases where the company fulfilled its contractual obligations and no fraud whatsoever was committed. Here's a word of advice: do not issue a chargeback against any company you ever want to do business with in the future.

While this is arguably less a problem with WalMart - issuing a chargeback won't get you banned from their physical stores - a chargeback is especially something be avoided with every vendor where you have an "account" of some sorts, except if you don't care about being banned (permanently).

The examples are numerous. Issuing a chargeback against car rental companies can put you on their DNR (Do Not Rent) list[0]. Issuing a chargeback against Amazon may result in a permanent ban (including loss of access to your Kindle library and even your AWS account)[1]. Issuing a chargeback against Sony for a purchase over PSN may get you banned from PSN[2].

[0] https://www.flyertalk.com/forum/hertz-gold-plus-rewards/1897...

[1] http://bricksetforum.com/discussion/comment/159184/#Comment_...

[2] https://www.reddit.com/r/PS4/comments/2ivsz3/beware_if_you_s...

That's good information to be aware of, but chargebacks should never be the first recourse, and often at the point in time when the consumer is pursuing a chargeback, they likely want nothing more to do with the offending company, anyways.

Can't they simply point to the policy, which you agreed to, and contest the chargeback? It's not a magic policy to get your money back because you are unhappy.

This. This should be a more common practice for bad customer experience, as long as it's not done for fraudulent reasons.

Just so people understand:

> Holders of credit cards issued in the United States are afforded reversal rights by Regulation Z of the Truth in Lending Act. United States debit card holders are guaranteed reversal rights by Regulation E of the Electronic Fund Transfer Act. Similar rights extend globally, pursuant to the rules established by the corresponding card association or bank network.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chargeback

Point being, chargeback isn't a service banks can stop providing if people start using it. It's written into the laws.

I assume if you start abusing it (trying to get things for free) then your bank will drop you as a cardholder.

No only that. I had what i thought legitimate card fraud but the problem was my card wasnt stolen and even worse - the chip was used and transaction was on the card. Eventually they got my money back via chargeback process but i found out later it was family-related fraud. Point being for 90 days my score went 10 ponts down and the credit card record was annotaded with message about this questionable chargeback. they could not believe it was true fraud.

That's unfortunate, and why we should have chip + PIN, not just chip.

I would be concerned about it hurting your credit score.

I should have done this.

Honestly, it never even crossed my mind to ask for a chargeback.

The number of times that I've had issues over the years is pretty small. For example, I think I've had two issues w/ Amazon over the years, and both times, they've fallen all over themselves trying to help. I think one time, they shipped me the wrong item, and they told me to just keep it and they would ship the correct item.

Service difference between the 2 vendors was like day and night.

Not too late to do a chargeback if they still haven’t refunded you. And will send some sort of signal in walmart’s internal systems. Companies track chargebacks.

Yea and amazon can resolve the issue without even having to talk to a human. The only time I have talked to an amazon employee was via email after I requested access to an ec2 instance(which felt weird, I wasn’t sure why it was so “exclusive” that I had to request access. Do they say no?)

That's pretty bad. A few years ago I ordered a big TV from Newegg around black Friday as a Christmas present. I got it a few weeks before Christmas. When Mom opened it Christmas day the screen was cracked out of the box. I hopped on with Newegg support and they asked why there was a long delay between order and damage. I explained it was a gift we just opened and they apologized then replaced it.

I think the big online retailers have realized that a good return/RMA policy is key to their continued success. If Walmart wants in on this world they will have to figure it out too.

You couldn't contact the manufacturer? They probably would have a warranty unless they are a Chinese white label product. There's also credit card benefits that may apply, return protection and extended warranty. Then there's also the aforementioned charge back.

Why wouldn't one always be able to avoid Wal-Mart? Hell, I'm sure I'd have a hard time giving up Amazon (which seems harder to avoid online), but it's really just a habit that would be difficult but not impossible to break entirely. Actually, moreso, because Amazon has worked it's way into so many facets of our lives, where Wal-Mart is far more limited online, and with physical stores, you've always got a choice.

WRT always being able to avoid Wal-Mart, in less populated areas when a Wal-Mart opens if there's any local competition it's generally decimated.

When in the SF bay area I never shop at Wal-Mart. On the SF peninsula you have to go to the south bay or over a bridge just to find one last I checked, there are plenty of options.

But after spending winter in a rural area, it's been quite surprising the number of times I've found myself in a Wal-Mart to buy household goods simply because there's no alternative. And boy does the quality of their products _suck_, it's pretty much a store 80% full of garbage, the stuff is so bad I experience buyer's remorse just looking at it on the shelves.

> in less populated areas when a Wal-Mart opens if there's any local competition it's generally decimated.

Or never really existed to begin with.

I have lived in towns where, before Walmart came in, there was nowhere in town to get certain things. You had to drive over an hour to the next largest town to find a store, and that's hard in bad weather.

> and with physical stores, you've always got a choice.

"Subject To Availability", as the poet once said.

You always have a choice in New York City or Atlanta. Not in Havre, Montana.

(Unless you skip physical stores and go to online ordering... in which case you're likely right back to Amazon.)

I would be surprised if Walmart accepted open box drone returns at all. My local electronics store does not. It makes sense too. I've bought two drones and both died quickly due to collisions. Maybe there are drones that are stable and easy to fly, but the product category seems designed to eat money. I lost interest after the second one.

Walmart accepts open box returns. They also accept returns without a receipt, though I'm sure they impose some limitations on those.

They also accept open pill bottles.

Walmart store certainly accepts open box returns, I've never personally had one, but I know people who've had them.

> turns out when you crush the competition with the world's best logistics technology you end up with a whole bunch of systems from the 70s/80s that are hard to update.

I hear Walmart makes much use of AS2. A means of transmission that I have had a lot of exposure to over the last few months (and absolutely no exposure to before this). While I think there were definitely some forward looking aspects to AS2, it's relative obscurity outside of very specific verticals and the fact that seemingly every COTS platform that implements it is overpriced and many years or even decades old (and feels like it) has not made my AS2 journey very pleasant to date.

So I just wanted to say: my condolences to you. :P

> I've had search so bad I can't even find what I'm looking for so I just give up and buy it on amazon.

Hang on, Amazon is the last place I'd go if poor search is something I want to avoid.

"But in 2018 going to the back office to get a 100 page printout generated by a mainframe once a day"

HOW?? Is there not an AS/2 to oracle sync. So you can at least get on oracle. Does walmart need one $$$?

https://docs.oracle.com/cd/E55243_01/pt854pbr0/eng/pt/tiba/t...

That said, fuck Oracle.

Well, that's documentation for PeopleSoft, so it's Oracle the company, but not necessarily backed by Oracle the database.

And to paraphrase the old quote, if you're having a problem sending messages between two systems, and you try to solve it by setting up an instance of the PeopleSoft Integration Broker, you now have a larger number of problems.

Do you think the JET Purchase and systems integration will help?

Not really. They seem bright but I don't think their competencies have much overlap with walmart's problems, at least from a technical perspective.

[edit]

I'd like to revise my answer. I answered your question thinking in terms of systems integration. However it's quite possible Mark Lore will be a much more effective CEO than the person he replaced.

This is the answer for so much in technology.

I am not sure what you describe is sensible reasons for the staleness of the technology.

If you look at the history of what happens to first movers you'll see it's pretty occurrence. Reality has no constraint to be sensible.