Upvoted the comment that says "I think this goes against YC philosophy". The YC guide explicitly calls out team experience and likelihood to succeed as a criterion.

I think there's a fetishization of complete blind objectivity in so many fields right now, which has at the root of it trying to iron out inequality. A laudable goal, but you shouldn't let that ideal completely upend the practical question to yourself of, where am I going to place my bets?

An unavoidable fact is that ideas alone are not enough to make some technology or venture successful. Sure, some one-off inventor may have a brilliant idea, but the idea is just like 1% of the problem.

If your model is to fund a team to develop an idea, the track record / personalities of the team are quite important.

Most people in this world are barely able to get their own lives under control. What's the likelihood that a random person with a great idea can take that to something commercially viable? There's a reason that who it is matters, and unfortunately, that still leads to people being selected who reflect the starting set of less-than-diverse people.