I feel like part of the story is missing because I have trouble imagining that UC couldn't easily find someone to head the institute. I would think that getting to head a well-endowed institute for a top-3 university would be one of the few steps up a Harvard professor could make--and then to have trouble even filling other tenured professorships?

Are the Pearsons notoriously difficult people? Was there a perception or whisper campaign that the institute wouldn't be as academically free or rigorous as advertised? Was Diermeier maneuvering behind the scenes to torpedo the institute? I get the sense that a lot of the story is still hidden.